Visual Music : Synaesthesia
in art and music since 1900
Themes & Hudson
Organised by Brougher K,
Strick, J, Wiseman, A and Zilczer, J
Essay by Mattis, O
Washington DC and Los
Angeles
P 18 ‘Music, musical instruments, and musical notation have proven
durable subjects for artists from Pablo
Picasso, Georges Braque, and Henri
Matisse to Jannis Kounellis,
Jean-Micahel Basquiat, and Christian
Marclay.’
‘These more-or-less literal depictions do not rely on the poetics of
synaesthesia. Few artists were more engaged with musical ideas than Piet Mondrian. Taking an entirely
different approach to the relationship between art and music, Mondrian engaged
with the compositional structures of jazz and bebop rather than with the
affective power of colour’
‘Similarly, the aleatory ideas of John
Cage proved enormously influential for visual artists in the second half of
the twentieth century, but those ideas bore little relation to the tradition of
synaesthesia’
p19 ‘Music is, of course, a time-based medium. Musical compositions
unfold through time: even the character of a single not is partly defined by
duration.’
‘The painter still has little or no control over the sequence or order
in which the viewer’s observations are made’
‘A further step in uniting visual and auditory experience has been
developed in recent years through the medium of instillation art’
p20 ‘In digital media, by contrast, music and visual art truly are
united, not only by experiencing subject, the listener/viewer, but by the
artist. They are created out of the same stuff, bits of electronic information,
infinitely interchangable’
p25 ‘The musical analogy – the premise that painting should emulate
music’
“as music is the poetry of sound, so is painting the poetry of sight”
James Whistler 1878
p31 “Kandinsky and Oscar Kokoschka paint pictures in which external
object is hardly more to them than a stimulus to improvise color and form and
to express themselves as only the composer expressed himself previously”
Schoenberg 1912
p32 ‘Kandinsky devised a three-stage system of pictoral composition that
would result in an abstract or “nonobjective” art comparable to music.
Impressions – the first pictoral category – represented the artist’s immediate visual sensation of external
reality.
Building upon that initial
“snapshot”, the painter converted first impressions into Improvisations by
giving vent to an inner need or as Kandinsky called it “inner necessity”.
In the third stage of pictoral development, the artist produced still
more imaginative Compositions in which creativity and free expression achieve full rein.’
P34 ‘ “Sound” he wrote “is the soul of form… Form is the outer expression of the inner content”’ Kandinsky
P41 “listening to a musical work evokes different images in everyone, an
accompaniment that each draws from his own visual memory. That is, chromatism
in music and musicality of colours has validity only as metaphor’ 1923 Kupka
P46 “coloured rhythm is not an illustration or an interpretation of a
musical work. It is an independent art, although based on the same
psychological principles as music… It is the mode of succession of the elements
in time, which establishes the analogy with music” 1914 Leopold Sturzwage
Synchromy
P59 Georgia Okeffe “her
Specials” ‘the idea that music could be translated into something for
the eye’ 1976
P62 Arthur Dove “Anybody
should be able to feel a certain state and express it in terms of paint of
music” 1923
P71 A colour scale on the keyboard in The Art of Mobile Colour
P77 “I have been striving to create an atmosphere around each movement,
and not by any means follow to the music measure for measure” Thomas Wilfred
1926
Len Lye ‘Colour Box’
1935 and Hy Hirsch ‘Eneri’ 1953
Jordan Belson ‘Samadhi’
moving image
The Joshua Light Show with
Janis Jopelin 1969 and Frank Zappa 1967
P181 ‘give the illusion that the canvas develops like music, in time, while both the old and modern
paintings exist strictly in space’ Russel and Macdonald-Wright
P203 ‘The effect of music and color in combination is hypnotic’
No comments:
Post a Comment